Inteligência Artificial e Educação Básica: Uma revisão sistemática das aplicações
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.41.e5Palabras clave:
STEAM, Inteligência artificial, STEM, EducaçãoResumen
O uso da Inteligência Artificial (IA) na educação está revolucionando as metodologias de ensino, tornando-as mais adaptáveis e inovadoras. A IA possibilita a criação de experiências de aprendizagem quase individualizadas, promovendo a igualdade de acesso ao conhecimento entre diferentes níveis socioeconômicos. Ferramentas de IA, integradas ao ambiente educacional, oferecem um poderoso suporte tanto para professores quanto para alunos. Para os educadores, a IA automatiza tarefas repetitivas e burocráticas, permitindo maior foco em atividades pedagógicas estratégicas. Para os alunos, proporciona suporte ideal na aprendizagem e prática dos conteúdos. Deste modo, esta revisão sistemática, realizada com o intuito de analisar diferentes tipos de personalização do ensino com o uso da IA, foi conduzida utilizando o protocolo PRISMA 2020 e critérios de inclusão e exclusão criteriosamente definidos para a análise dos artigos selecionados. Os principais resultados permitiram identificar diferentes metodologias de ensino que vão além do ensino tradicional, demonstrando a utilização prática e efetiva da IA
Descargas
Referencias
[1] M. A. Chaudhry and E. Kazim, “Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high-level academic and industry note 2021,” AI Ethics, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z.
[2] G. G. da C. Júnior and R. do N. Fidalgo, “Scene Board: Inteligência Artificial & Comunicação Aumentativa e Alternativa para a Educação Inclusiva,” in Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação - SBIE), vol. 30, no. 1, p. 1301, 2019.
[3] W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: The Center For Curriculum Redesign, 2019. ISBN: 978-1-794-29370-0.
[4] G. Linares del Carmen and I. Suazo Galdames, “Aprovechando el Potencial de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación: Equilibrando Beneficios y Riesgos,” European Journal of Education and Psychology, pp. 1–8, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v16i1.2205.
[5] F. Ouyang and P. Jiao, “Artificial intelligence in education: the three paradigms,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100020, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020.
[6] S.-Y. Chen, P.-H. Lin, and W.-C. Chien, “Children’s Digital Art Ability Training System Based on AI-Assisted Learning: A Case Study of Drawing Color Perception,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823078.
[7] J. Zhu and C. Ren, “Analysis of the Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Role Cognition in the Education System,” Occupational Therapy International, vol. 2022, p. e1781662, May 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1781662.
[8] J. McCarthy, M. L. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. E. Shannon, “A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955,” AI Magazine, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 12–12, Aug. 1955, doi: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904.
[9] N. Bostrom, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[10] N. Gridchina, N. Savvina, and S. Zavyalov, “Topical Issues of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education and Law,” Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tele58910.2023.10184378.
[11] I. Vostroknutov, S. G. Grigoriev, and L. Surat, “Search for a New Paradigm of Education and Artificial Intelligence. Place and Role of Artificial Intelligence in the New Education System,” Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tele52840.2021.9482486.
[12] D. Henriksen, “Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices,” STEAM, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20140102.15.
[13] M. E. Sanders, “STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania,” The Technology Teacher, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 20–26, Jan. 2009.
[14] M.-T. Wang, “Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests,” Developmental Psychology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1643–1657, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027247.
[15] D. Bell, D. Morrison-Love, D. Wooff, and M. McLain, “STEM education in the twenty-first century: learning at work—an exploration of design and technology teacher perceptions and practices,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 721–737, Jun. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9414-3.
[16] U. D’Ambrosio, “Sobre las propuestas curriculares STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) y STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics) y el programa de etnomatemática,” Paradigma, pp. 151–167, Jun. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.37618/paradigma.1011-2251.2020.p151-167.id876.
[17] C. E. Hughes et al., “RAISE: Robotics & AI to improve STEM and social skills for elementary school students,” Frontiers in Virtual Reality, vol. 3, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.968312.
[18] O. A. Santana, B. A. de Sousa, S. R. S. do Monte, M. L. de F. Lima, and C. F. e Silva, “Deep learning practice for high school student engagement in STEM careers,” in Proc. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Apr. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/educon45650.2020.9125281.
[19] L. S. Ferro, F. Sapio, A. Terracina, M. Temperini, and M. Mecella, “Gea2: A Serious Game for Technology-Enhanced Learning in STEM,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 723–739, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2022.3143519.
[20] O. C. Santos and A. Albiol, “Can Aikido Help With the Comprehension of Physics? A First Step Towards the Design of Intelligent Psychomotor Systems for STEAM Kinesthetic Learning Scenarios,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 176458–176469, Dec. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2957947.
[21] J. Gao, J. Gong, G. Zhou, H. Guo, and T. Qi, “Learning with Yourself: a Tangible Twin Robot System to Promote STEM Education,” in Proc. 2022 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981423.
[22] M. Naya-Varela, S. Guerreiro-Santalla, T. Baamonde, and F. Bellas, “Robobo SmartCity: An Autonomous Driving Model for Computational Intelligence Learning through Educational Robotics,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2023.3244604.
[23] P. Ponce, A. Molina, O. Mata, and G. Baltazar, “LEGO® EV3 Platform for STEM Education in Elementary School,” in Proc. 2019 8th Int. Conf. on Educational and Information Technology, Mar. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3318426.
[24] S. C. Relmasira, Y. C. Lai, and J. P. Donaldson, “Fostering AI Literacy in Elementary Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education in the Age of Generative AI,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 18, p. 13595, Sep. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813595.
[25] S.-Y. Chen, P.-H. Lin, and W.-C. Chien, “Children’s Digital Art Ability Training System Based on AI-Assisted Learning: A Case Study of Drawing Color Perception,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823078.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Thiago da Silva Fialho, Christian de Vargas Silva, Fabricio Herpich, Marina Sérgio Carradore, Eliane Pozzebon
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Derechos de autor y licencias
Los artículos aceptados para publicación tendrán la licencia de Creative Commons BY-NC. Los autores deben firmar un acuerdo de distribución no exclusiva después de la aceptación del artículo.
